to have 2 photographers from different companies to cover my wedding?
I don't think it would be wrong. It may be annoying to the photog's and you may want to make sure they are aware of the other one. Why are you doing 2 if you don't mind me asking?
Agree with kells76. DH's uncle is "semi-pro" and I was getting frustrated that he was getting in the way of our pro photographer. Plus we had a lot of guests who wanted to take a own photo. Ask your main photographer how he/she feels about a 2nd photographer... and maybe split the responsibility- main photographer focuses on the bride/gm/wedding party/details and the 2nd photographer focuses on guests/etc. HTH.
i feel like ppl do this already..when i read photographer blogs sometimes they mention that there were more than one of them (representing different companies) there.
i'm having 2 (just in case) I'm pananoid
i'm getting two photogs, but they are from the same place....the owner and her sister, both professionals...
I think it would be fine. I would love two photogs but the budget wont allow :(
Its not uncommon to have 2 photogs from different companies. It is key that they are aware (just as previous posts said) about each other. If not careful, 2 photogs can actually get in the way of one another. I think OCbride's idea of having them have different things to focus on.
Good luck :)
photogs already do this - dont worry =)
as long as you've told both of them, it shuoldnt be a problem
As the smart ladies have said make sure its ok. We had someone offer to be a backup photog for free but our main photog has a "no second photog" clause in her contrct. We had to tell him no.