ok so most of you know that fh and dont live together... i live in the bay area and he lvies in long beach...
we are now thinking of where to live once we're married, and he suggested temecula (ugh!) since it's about an hour to his job and 45 minutes drive for me to visit my boss, if i need to... i am hooked up at home and dont commute now - i
just plug in and work... but on those occassions when i do need to go in - he thought temecula was a nice compromise for the 2 of us...
the only thing is i do not want to live inland - what's the point of moving to socal and not live by the water, kwim??
no offense to anyone who lives there now, but it's just not my idea of living in socal. my old apt was 5 minutes from the beach and i lived pretty central to everything - i dont like the idea of living inland - but then temecula has great
prices on homes right now... we could probably get one close to free...
long beach to chino is about 40 minutes for him; and i totally woulnt mind living in lbc - but temecula??? no way... aarrgghh - but then he makes a great point in that it's not forever...
fffffck! help me feel better about this... nothing is set in stone - we're still in pre-lim stages, but he and i are already both so adamant about our positions about this.